Legal Opinion
Griebel v. Andersen Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1992No. C6-90-2322PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
Defendants-petitioners Andersen Corporation and the Radford Company obtained review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals reversing the judgment of dismissal of the plaintiff James Griebel, et al.’s complaint. We entertain review for the sole purpose of clarifying the scope and applicability of the 2-year statute of limitations for claims of damages or injury resulting from “defective and unsafe” improvements to real property, Minn.Stat. § 541.051 (1988), and reverse and remand to the court of appeals for further proceedings.
Plaintiffs James and Paula Griebel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Bulau v. Hector Plumbing and Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lietz v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Appletree Square 1 Ltd. Partnership v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. M.A. Mortenson CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- In re Hardieplank Fiber Cement Siding Litig.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Oreck v. Harvey Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.