Legal Opinion
B. & H. Passmore Metal & Roofing Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1945No. 2959PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
New Amsterdam Casualty Company 1 brought this action against B. & H. Pass-more Metal & Roofing Co., Inc., 2 under- section 274d of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, seeking a determination, by declaratory judgment, of the duties, rights, and obligations of the Casualty Company under a policy of liability insurance issued by it to Passmore.
The material provisions of the policy read as follows:
“New Amsterdam Casualty Company * * * Does hereby agree with the insured, * * *
“To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become obligated to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Benham v. American Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Head v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Cicala v. Disability Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Lumber Mutual Casualty Ins. Co. v. StukesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Artukovich v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- South Dakota Public Entity Pool for Liability v. WingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.