Legal Opinion
White-Nathan v. Nathan
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 27, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 93-0046PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Judge.
Frederick Reid Nathan (“Nathan”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment on the grounds that it fails to give full faith and credit to a California Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (“RURE-SA”) order. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Pursuant to a 1989 Arizona decree of dissolution, Carol White-Nathan (“White”) was awarded custody of the couple’s son, and Nathan was ordered to pay $2,200 per month child support from August 1989 through May 1994, then $1,500 per month commencing in June 1994, until their child became eighteen or was sooner…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re Marriage of PopenhagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Ibach v. IbachArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Campbell v. JenneMontana Supreme Court · 1977
- Bjugan v. BjuganWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Office of Child Support Enforcement v. EagleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Jefferson County Child Support Enforcement Unit v. HollandsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Pavlovich v. PavlovichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- In Re the Marriage of YuroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Gerkin v. GerkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.