Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Yuro
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 24, 1998No. 2 CA-CV 97-0225PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal involves a relatively straightforward child support collection action made complex by its long history and ensuing changes in state and federal child support laws, as well as concomitant questions of preemption and retroactivity. In June 1997, the Pima County Child Support Division filed on behalf of appellant, Francine Yuro, a resident of California, a request pursuant to Arizona’s Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), 1 formerly A.R.S. §§ 12-1651 through 12-1691, 2 to collect child support and spousal maintenance arrearages in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jarvis v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- McKellar v. McKellarNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Support Obligation of Day v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Carter v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Marriage of DougallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Holdaway-Foster v. BrunellNevada Supreme Court · 2014
- Lambesis v. LambesisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- McCammon v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Tiffany Taylor v. Thomas PandolaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.