Legal Opinion

Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1934No. L. A. No. 14706PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The respondent Marmurowicz was employed as a waiter in the dining room of the Barker Hotel in the city of Los Angeles on August 27, 1933. At this same time a Miss Marshall was employed in the kitchen of said hotel. The latter was stationed at the salad and dessert counter and, among other things, was required to prepare and deliver to the respective waiters the salads and desserts ordered by them for patrons. On the day above mentioned Marmurowicz, in the course and scope of his employment, had placed an order for ice cream with Miss Marshall. Apparently the order was not immediately attended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Coronado Beach Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. San Diego & Arizona Railway Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Warren Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Magliulo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Conway v. GlobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API