Legal Opinion

Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1924No. S. F. No. 10948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

This is an application for a writ of review for the purpose of determining the lawfulness of an award and certain orders of the Industrial Accident Commission. The petitioner is the insurance carrier of Robert A. Gebhardt, the owner of a restaurant, who had in his employ the respondent, Ernest Kopp, a cook, and one Paul Griffith, who was a dishwasher and roustabout. As the result of an altercation between the two men, Griffith struck Kopp on the head,. breaking his jawbone and inflicting other injuries. Kopp, in due time, presented to the Industrial Accident Commission a claim for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. San Diego & Arizona Railway Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Warren Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Stulginski v. Waterbury Rolling Mills Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Keithley v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API