Legal Opinion
Warren Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1923No. Civ. No. 4702PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
This is an original proceeding to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission allowing compensation to one C. M. Keily for an injury suffered while in the employ of petitioner. It is claimed that such injury did not arise out of the employment and that it was not proximately caused thereby as required by the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Stats, 1917, p. 831), so as to entitle the employee to compensation.
Keily was employed by the Warren Construction Company as a timekeeper, and was so employed on the seventeenth day of November, 1922. At that time the company was insured against…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Coronado Beach Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Metropolitan Redwood Lumber Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Penland v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ætna Life Ins. v. WindhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- San Diego & Arizona Railway Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924