Legal Opinion

Gargano v. Rubin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants Isidor Rubin and Arnold Elbogen appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated November 17, 1986, which denied their motion to cancel a notice of pendency filed against the subject property by the plaintiffs.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the County Clerk of Kings County is directed to cancel both the May 2, 1986 and the June 20, 1986 notices of pendency filed against the subject property.

CPLR 6514 (a) mandates the cancellation of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Israelson v. BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Cohen v. BiberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. William Iser, Inc. v. GarnettNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Deerfield Building Corp. v. Yorkstate Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Levy v. KonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weiner v. MKVII-Westchester, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Vincent v. SeamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Bank of New York v. MacPhersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Chiulli v. ReiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. DaSilva v. Suozzi, English, Cianciulli & Peirez, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API