Legal Opinion

William Iser, Inc. v. Garnett

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

This motion to cancel a lis pendens filed before the commencement of an action presents the question of whether completion of substituted service must be effected within *451the 30-day period following the filing of the notice of pendency of the action.

The facts of the ease are undisputed. The lis pendens was filed on February 17, 1965, and substituted service of summons was made on March 11, 1965 (CPLR. 308, subd. 3). Proof of service of summons was filed in the office of the Clerk of Nassau County on March 22,1965, and service of summons became complete within the purview of CPLR 308 (subd. 3)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Israelson v. BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Molyneaux v. SevillaNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Esteves v. SwobodzienNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Toubin v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. KindorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Drinnon v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Deerfield Building Corp. v. Yorkstate Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Gargano v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Copper v. ProkosNew York Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API