Legal Opinion
DaSilva v. Suozzi, English, Cianciulli & Peirez, P. C.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David Goldstein, J.
In this legal malpractice action, defendants Albanese, Albanese & Fiore, a partnership, and Albanese, Albanese & Fiore, P. C., seek an order granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, in the alternative, seek partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claim for lost profits. Codefendants, Suozzi, English, Cianciulli & Peirez, P. C., and Suozzi, English & Cianciulli, P. C., cross-move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment, dismissing plaintiff’s claim for lost profits.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Da Silva v. MussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Da Silva v. MussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bernstein v. Oppenheim & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Grago v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Re v. Kornstein Veisz & WexlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Silva v. Suozzi, English,Cianciulli & Peirez, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996