Legal Opinion
In Re a Disbarred Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Arrotta
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 2004No. SB-04-0015-RPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 The issue in this case is whether Richard B. Arrotta, who was disbarred in 1995, has established that he should be readmitted to the Arizona State Bar. We conclude that he has not established that he has been rehabilitated and deny his application for reinstatement. We review this matter pursuant to Arizona Rule of the Supreme Court 65(b)(5).
I
¶2 Arrotta was admitted to practice in Arizona in 1974. Over the next twenty years, he worked for the United States Army as a Judge Advocate General, for the Pima County Attorney’s Office as a deputy county…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re: BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Petition of PierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- In re MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re HammArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re KingArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Matter of Richard B. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re LazcanoArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. Riley Briones, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.