Legal Opinion
Laulifou Aaitui v. Grande Properties
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1994No. B080558PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ORTEGA, Acting P. J.
We affirm the summary judgment granted to the City of Long Beach in this drowning case.
Background
A four-year-old girl drowned in an apartment house swimming pool, owned by the Azar family and its alter ego, Grande Properties. For approximately the three previous years, the City of Long Beach had, pursuant to its municipal code, routinely inspected the pool and issued numerous citations for safety violations, giving notice that the pool was to be closed until the defects were corrected. The pool’s gate was broken off its hinges and was not self-closing or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marshak v. BallesterosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Barkley v. City of Blue LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Public Utilities Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Goddard v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lane v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.