Legal Opinion
Marshak v. Ballesteros
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 16, 1999No. B122465PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.
Plaintiff Sidney Marshak appeals the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant Emma H. Ballesteros in this attorney malpractice action. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.
Facts
In the fall of 1993, defendant undertook to represent plaintiff in the dissolution of his 24-year marriage. On June 9, 1994, the court conducted a mandatory settlement conference, at which plaintiff and his ex-wife stipulated in open court to a settlement of the dissolution action. The settlement terms dealt with issues of attorney fees, restraining orders, and distribution of property.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Viner v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Thompson v. AsimosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Charnay v. CobertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Corey v. Norman, Hanson & DeTroySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.