Legal Opinion

Lane v. City of Sacramento

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 2010No. C060744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBIE, J.

J.—In these consolidated cases, plaintiffs John Montgomery and Ida Lane sought to hold defendant City of Sacramento liable for injuries they sustained when Montgomery’s car struck a concrete divider on a city street. Concluding that plaintiffs had failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the divider constituted a dangerous condition of public property for which the city could be held liable under Government Code 1 section 835, the trial court granted the city’s summary judgment motion.

On appeal, we conclude the trial court erred in granting the city’s motion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Miller v. Bechtel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Rodkey v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Antenor v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Hernandez v. Modesto Portuguese Pentecost Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Salas v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Cordova v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Stack v. City of LemooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API