Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 14, 1994No. Civ. 92-1342R(CM), 93-0194R(CM)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING JACKSON’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1

RHOADES, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment by defendant Jeffrey Jackson, a Sheriffs deputy, in a wrongful death action arising from the shooting death of Paul Reynolds. On February, 4, 1994, the County of San Diego joined the motion. (County’s Notice of Join-der). Two suits were filed: one by the decedent’s wife, Jeanette Reynolds, and one by the decedent’s mother, Denise Reynolds. The actions have been consolidated. The complaints asked for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as under state civil…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Munoz v. City of Union CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Edson v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Johnson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Edson v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Price v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API