Legal Opinion

Edson v. City of Anaheim

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1998No. G016576PublishedCited by 79 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEDSWORTH, J.

This is an appeal from a defense verdict in a wrongful death action. The lawsuit arose from an incident in which Robert Edson was shot and killed when Anaheim Police Officer Smith, trying to arrest him, thought he was reaching for a gun.

Edson’s widow and children (the Edsons) sued Smith and the City of Anaheim (City). A jury found that Smith acted reasonably under the circumstances, and judgment was entered for defendants. The Edsons claim that a part of BAJI No. 2.60 on the burden of proof was given erroneously because the police had the burden of proving that the force…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Roy v. Inhabitants of the City of LewistonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Douglas Edwards v. City of Philadelphia and Officer Haworth, James, Badge No. 2944Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Grieger v. VegaTexas Supreme Court · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Chelsey Hayes v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Brown v. RansweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Munoz v. City of Union CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Venegas v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Yount v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API