Legal Opinion

Fertilizer Co. v. . Summerell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover the balance due on two certain notes described in the complaint, to wit, the sum of $1,186.89 and interest, and the sum of $247.87 and interest. The notes sued on were executed by the defendant under his seal, and are payable to the plaintiff or its order. The said notes were due and payable on 1 November and 1 December, 1930, respectively. This action was begun on 18 February, 1931.

In his answer the defendant alleged that the consideration for the notes sued on was fertilizer sold to the defendant by the plaintiff; he alleges that the fertilizer delivered to him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Swift & Co. v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Holbrook v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. American Trust Co. v. AnagnosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API