Legal Opinion

American Trust Co. v. Anagnos

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdaMs, J.

Tbe plaintiff excepted to tbe following instructions: “Tbe court charges that tbe defendant having admitted execution of this note, it will be jour duty to answer this issue $5,000 with interest from 3 March, 1927, but if tbe defendant has satisfied you by tbe greater weight of tbe evidence that it was agreed by a representative of tbe bank that it should not be paid, that be should not be called upon to pay it, but that it was a matter of accommodation of tbe bank or if you shall find it to be true by tbe greater weight of tbe evidence that tbe note was without consideration, tbe court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leaksville-Spray Institute v. MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Grady v. Pink Hill Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Farmers Co-Operative Fertilizer Co. v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Stansell v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Fawcett v. . FawcettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Ex Parte BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Richardson v. . SatterwhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Bank of Lewiston v. HarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Fertilizer Co. v. . SummerellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API