Legal Opinion
Service by Medallion, Inc. v. Clorox Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 1996No. H013857PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Service By Medallion, Inc. (Medallion) appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint without leave to amend, following an order sustaining the demurrer of defendant Clorox Company. Medallion contends (1) the trial court erred in ruling that the action was preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 United States Code sections 157 and 158, and (2) the third amended complaint adequately stated a cause of action for fraudulent inducement of a contractual relationship. We agree with Medallion’s first contention, but hold nonetheless that the complaint was fatally…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Goehring v. Chapman UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Carter v. Prime Healthcare Paradise Valley LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Persson v. Smart Inventions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- City of San Jose v. Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3California Supreme Court · 2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.