Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Smogard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 22, 1974No. 44186PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
Defendant and third-party plaintiff, Merrill J. Smogard, appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a district court order dismissing his third-party complaint against Quality Mercury, Inc., employer of the plaintiff. We grant discretionary review, 1 and reverse.
Plaintiff, David N. Carlson, brought this action against Smo-gard, alleging negligence in the installation of a hood latch extension device in his (defendant’s) automobile. Smogard denied any negligent conduct and alleged, through a third-party complaint against plaintiff’s employer, Quality Mercury, Inc., that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Lunderberg v. BiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Haney v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Sargent v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.