Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1971No. 7119SC83PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Defendant contends in the first two assignments of error that the judge committed error in failing to allow his1 motion to quash the charges in the purported warrant. The motion was made “ [b] efore evidence was introduced.”

It appears from the record that at the 8 December 1969 Term of Recorder’s Court of Randolph County, the defendant pleaded not guilty and was found guilty of assault on an officer and resisting arrest. From the judgment imposed, he appealed to the superior court. No motion to quash the warrant appears in the record of the trial in the recorder’s court.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. FennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rousselo v. StarlingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. NickensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. NickensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API