Legal Opinion

Rousselo v. Starling

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1998No. COA97-304PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

This case arises from a stop and search of Gary J. Rousello’s vehicle on 3 August 1992 by a North Carolina State Highway Patrolman, William J. Starling. In this appeal, Trooper Starling first contends that the trial court erroneously failed to grant summary judgment for him on Rousselo’s claim for an alleged violation of his constitutional rights to be free from unlawful search and seizure. We agree and conclude that under the doctrine of qualified immunity Trooper Starling was immune from suit because a reasonable person in his position would not have known that his actions…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Richmond v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Wilkerson v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Staley v. LingerfeltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Estate of Fennell Ex Rel. Fennell v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Iglesias v. WolfordDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API