Legal Opinion

Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Henry

California Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 8465PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The judgment is reversed. Enough of the facts and the principles applicable thereto to show the propriety of this conclusion will now be set forth.

Plaintiff sued defendants to cancel a certain outstanding instrument, purporting to be a contract of sale and purchase, made by it with defendant Henry under date of February 1, 1923, affecting the title to certain lots in Los Angeles known as Nos. 188 and 189 of tract 2189 of Pellissier Square, as per the official map thereof. The complaint was in two counts, the first in the ordinary form of an action to quiet title and the second attaching…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. O'Connor v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API