Legal Opinion
Ross v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 2, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1450 (RWR)(AK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee Bryan Ross, brought this action against defendant Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) arguing that Continental breached a contract by failing to defend and indemnify the Law Offices of Stanley H. Goldschmidt, P.C. (“Goldschmidt, P.C.”) for liability arising from a malpractice lawsuit. Continental filed a counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment that the policy did not cover Goldschmidt, P.C.’s claim. Continental has moved for judgment on the pleadings, or in the alterna tive for summary…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago Insurance Company v. Paulson & Nace, PLLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Capitol Speciality Insurance v. Sanford Wittels & Heisler, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Chicago Insurance Company v. Paulson & Nace, PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation v. Sanford, Wittels & Heisler, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Marshall v. ISMIE Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025