Stovall v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
Appellant predicates his motion for rehearing upon the claimed errors reflected by Bills of Exception Nos. 2 and 3, complaining of the argument of the district attorney.
In qualifying Bill No. 3, the court certifies that no other objection was made to said argument save that complained of in Bill No. 2. This qualification destroys the bill. It was accepted without objection and the appellant as well as this court is bound thereby.
As to Bill No. 2, in addition to what was said in our original opinion, we observe that it has been the consistent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Alamo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Hatley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.