Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Boyles
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, May Boyles and George W. Boyles, her husband, brought suit in the epurt1 below against the' Borough of Darby to recover for, injuries sustained by *344Mrs. Boyles while walking upon a defective sidewalk in front of 872 Main Street, Darby. Under the Pennsylvania procedure then followed in the court below the borough brought in by writs of scire facias Jennie Gottlieb Bron and the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (hereinafter called the A. & P.) as additional defendants, the former being the owner and the latter the tenant of the abutting premises. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McLaughlin v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Bruder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Mintzer v. GreenoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Philadelphia v. Merchant & Evans Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Gossler v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
- Weingreen v. Gomberg, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1964
- Paula Shannon v. High-Low Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954