Legal Opinion

Drown v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1952No. 13241PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, Dr. Drown, is a chiropractor who' does business in Hollywood, California under the name of Drown Laboratories. Appellant manufactures certain photographic, therapeutic and diagnostic instruments of her own design which she uses in her practice. She sold one of these instruments to a Mr. Rice, resident of Blue Island, Illinois, for which s’he was charged with selling a device that was misbranded, in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq., by reason of claims in its labeling which were allegedly false and misleading…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Lott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. George Stine Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Charles E. Dickey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API