Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Marshall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2009No. 200,577-2PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.

¶1 In 2006, the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) charged Bradley R. Marshall with 12 counts of violating the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). Mr. Marshall has been the subject of three prior disciplinary actions. In the present disciplinary action, the hearing officer made over 175 findings of fact in addition to conclusions of law relating to each charged count of misconduct. The hearing officer recommended that Mr. Marshall be disbarred, and the Disciplinary Board (Board) unanimously agreed.

¶2 We have elected to follow the recommendation of the unanimous Board and disbar Mr.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PooleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AnschellWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against KingWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KingWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API