Legal Opinion
State v. Saunders
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 29, 1994No. S-94-0177PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ACCELERATED DOCKET ORDER
Appellant was charged by Information in Tulsa County, Case No. CM-93-1515 with Stalking. On November 22, 1993, Appellee filed a Motion to Dismiss before trial alleging 21 O.S.Supp.1993, § 1173 is unconstitutional. A hearing on the motion to dismiss was held on November 30, 1993. Judge Musseman granted the Appellee’s motion to dismiss finding that the statute is “unconstitutional in that it violates the due process clause, as well as the fifth amendment, presumption of innocence, and that it is vague, overbroad, and cannot be reasonably interpreted by anyone subject to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. HeilmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hayes v. Municipal Court of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- State v. PrattCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Wallace v. Van PeltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Luplow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FonsecaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.