Legal Opinion

State v. Pratt

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 23, 1991No. S-90-724PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSON, Judge:

The State, under a reserved question of law (22 O.S.1981, § 1053.1), is appealing a ruling of Special Judge William Musseman in the District Court of Tulsa County. On January 5, 1990, in Case No. CF-90-66, Judge Musseman sustained appellee’s demur to the Information on the charge of Assault and Battery on a Police Officer (21 O.S.Supp.1989, § 649) on the belief that the statute was unconstitutionally vague and overprotective of a class of citizens.

On January 17, 1990, the State filed its Notice of Intent to Appeal. Recognizing that the time of the filing was past the ten…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Swart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. State v. SaundersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. State v. ClabornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API