Legal Opinion

State v. Fonseca

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 8, 1996No. 95-59-C.APublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOURCIER, Justice.

This case concerns the constitutionality of Rhode Island’s former version of the statute prohibiting “stalking.” On January 9, 1995, a Superior Court trial justice dismissed a criminal misdemeanor complaint against the defendant, David J. Fonseca, ruling that G.L. 1956 (1994 Reenactment) § 11-59-2 was unconstitutionally vague because it was “facially ambiguous.” The dismissal order was entered on January 17,1995. From that order, the state has filed its appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, the General Assembly, on February 16, 1995, amended the stalking statute…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. BreenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. State v. FritzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API