People v. Stuart
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*414OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
In 1999, the Legislature criminalized “stalking.” The crime contemplates an intentional course of conduct with no legitimate purpose in which the offender targets a particular person. The conduct must be likely to place, the victim in reasonable fear of material harm, or cause the victim mental or emotional harm (see Penal Law § 120.45).1 In seeking reversal of his conviction, defendant contends that the anti-stalking statute is unconstitutionally vague both on its face and as applied to him. We disagree and therefore affirm the order of the Appellate Term…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Arriaga v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
- People v. GarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.