Legal Opinion

People v. Stuart

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 2003PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*414OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenblatt, J.

In 1999, the Legislature criminalized “stalking.” The crime contemplates an intentional course of conduct with no legitimate purpose in which the offender targets a particular person. The conduct must be likely to place, the victim in reasonable fear of material harm, or cause the victim mental or emotional harm (see Penal Law § 120.45).1 In seeking reversal of his conviction, defendant contends that the anti-stalking statute is unconstitutionally vague both on its face and as applied to him. We disagree and therefore affirm the order of the Appellate Term…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Arriaga v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. People v. GarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API