Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 10, 2010No. 08-70268PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

We consider the maximum weekly rate that applies to an employee’s compensation for disability under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act.

I

A

The Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA” or “Act”), 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., requires employers to compensate maritime employees for “disability or death [that] results from an injury occurring upon the navigable waters of the United States,” id. § 903(a). Calculating the statutorily required rate of compensation for disability generally involves the following steps. First, we determine the “average weekly wage of…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Rucker v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Wilkerson v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rothgery v. Gillespie CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Price v. Stevedoring Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Keller Foundation/case Fndn v. Joseph TracyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Price v. Stevedoring Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API