Rothgery v. Gillespie County
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter
This Court has held that the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment applies at the first appearance before a judicial officer at which a defendant is told of the formal accusation against him and restrictions are imposed on his liberty. See Brewer v. Williams, 430 U. S. 387, 398-399 (1977); Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U. S. 625, 629, n. 3 (1986). The question here is whether attachment of the right also requires that a public prosecutor (as distinct from a police *195officer) be aware of that initial proceeding or involved in its conduct. We hold that it does not.
I
A
Although petitioner…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by401 opinions
- Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Montejo v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. HaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Commonwealth v. BriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. ColavitaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
396 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.