Legal Opinion
Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 26, 2002No. 00-1770PublishedCited by 305 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
With drug dealers “increasingly imposing a reign of terror on public and other federally assisted low-income housing tenants,” Congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. § 5122, 102 Stat. 4301, 42 U. S. C. § 11901(3) (1994 ed.). The Act, as later amended, provides that each “public housing agency shall utilize leases which ... provide that any criminal activity that threatens the health, safety, or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other tenants or any drug-related criminal activity on or off such premises, engaged in by a public housing tenant, any member of the tenant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by305 opinions
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Demery v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System et ano.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
300 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.