Kennedy v. South Carolina Retirement System
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellants have filed a petition for rehearing and a motion to allow oral argument. Respondents have filed a return, opposing appellants’ petition and motion. We deny the petition and motion.
In order to prevail on a petition for rehearing, appellants must demonstrate the Court overlooked or misapprehended their argument. Rule 221(a), SCACR. The dissent argues the appellants’ petition should be granted because of “one significant argument not previously considered by the Court.” The argument was not considered because it was never presented to this Court. Further, there is no evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kennedy v. South Carolina Retirement SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Butler v. Town of EdgefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Arnold v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
3Cited by13 opinions
- West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority v. A.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Perrine v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- Watson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.