State v. Austin
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Sanders, Chief Judge:
Defendant Steven Columbus Austin appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the trial judge erred in admitting certain evidence seized by the police as the result of a search. We remand.
I
THE ISSUES
The evidence in question, a quantity of marijuana, was seized following the issuance of a search warrant. Mr. Austin’s single exception presents the issues of whether the warrant was defective in violation of the Federal and State Constitutions. The trial judge ruled that the warrant was, indeed, defective, but that the evidence…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Watson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- Kennedy v. South Carolina Retirement SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.