Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 7, 1991No. 1706PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

Defendant Steven Columbus Austin appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the trial judge erred in admitting certain evidence seized by the police as the result of a search. We remand.

I

THE ISSUES

The evidence in question, a quantity of marijuana, was seized following the issuance of a search warrant. Mr. Austin’s single exception presents the issues of whether the warrant was defective in violation of the Federal and State Constitutions. The trial judge ruled that the warrant was, indeed, defective, but that the evidence…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Watson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Kennedy v. South Carolina Retirement SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API