Legal Opinion
Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 28, 2012No. 2011-1263PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Promega Corporation (“Promega”) appeals a decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin granting Invitrogen IP Holdings, Inc.’s (“IP Holdings”) motion to compel arbitration. Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp., No. 10-cv-281 (W.D.Wis. Feb. 16, 2011) (“Arbitration Order”). Because the district court properly compelled arbitration, we affirm.
*1354Background
In 1996, Research Genetics, Inc. (“Research Genetics”) was the exclusive worldwide licensee…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012