Legal Opinion
Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 13, 2017No. 2017-2130PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, denying the Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration of their pending litigation with Waymo LLC. 1 The Defendants are Uber Technologies, Inc., Ottomotto LLC, and Otto Trucking LLC. The Appellants are Uber Technologies, Inc. and Ottomotto LLC (collectively “Uber” or “Appellants”). Anthony Levandowski is an Intervenor in this case.
The Appellants do not assert that an arbitration agreement exists between any of the Defendants and Waymo. The Appellants instead argue…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jessica Kramer v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. B. v. Chart Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Mattson Technology v. Applied MaterialsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Mattson Technology, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Michael Dichard v. Robert Morgan, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017