Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
Illumina, Inc. (“Illumina”) appeals a district court order denying Illumina’s motion to compel arbitration. Illumina and Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. (“Ariosa”) entered into a supply agreement in which the parties agreed that certain disputes will be subject to compulsory arbitration. The arbitration clause came into dispute when Illumina sued Ariosa for patent infringement, and Ariosa counterclaimed for breach of contract on grounds that, under the terms of the supply agreement, Ariosa had a license to the patent-in-suit. Illumina invoked the arbitration clause of the supply…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Preston v. FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Tracer Research Corp. v. National Environmental Services Company, Doing Business as Nesco Lab One Analytical, Inc. Eddy Paterson Albert McCutchanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. v. The University of Toronto Innovations FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Ecoservices, LLC v. Certified Aviation Servs., LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- American GNC Corporation v. Nintendo Co LtdDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.