Legal Opinion

Kenly v. Ukegawa

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1993No. D015478PublishedCited by 32 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FROEHLICH, J.

Plaintiff Lindsey David Kenly (Kenly) sued defendants Hiroshi Ukegawa (Ukegawa), Vista Loma Investments, a California general partnership (Vista Loma), and Ukegawa Brothers, a California general partnership (Ukegawa Brothers) for fraud. Kenly prevailed and recovered an award of $800,000 in compensatory damages and $200,000 in punitive damages.

Defendants do not challenge the liability determination on Kenly’s fraud claim, but do contest the propriety of the amount of compensatory damages. Similarly, defendants concede substantial evidence supports a punitive damage award in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Christiansen v. RoddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Simon v. San Paolo US Holding Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Eckert Cold Storage, Inc. v. BehlDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1996
  5. Mike Davidov Company v. IssodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API