Legal Opinion

Norris v. R & T Manufacturing, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 1, 2014No. 101116202; A150859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

Defendant R & T Manufacturing, LLC (R & T), a limited liability company organized under ORS chapter 63, appeals from a general judgment for plaintiff in this action for damages under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act (UFTA), ORS 95.200 to 95.310. The trial court found that R & T’s principals and only members, Robert and Thomas Laney, dissolved Action Accessories, LLC (Action) and transferred its business and assets to R & T for the purpose of avoiding a judgment that Action owed to plaintiff. As a remedy, the court imposed a judgment against R & T in the amount of plaintiffs outstanding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oregon Account Systems, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Kellstrom Bros. Painting v. Carriage Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Preferred Funding, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. In re the Marriage of SalgadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Norris v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Official Comm. Unsecured Creditors of HH Liquidation, LLC v. Comvest Grp. Holdings, LLC (In re HH Liquidation, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
  2. Norris v. R & T Manufacturing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Estate of Marshall v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
  4. Tribble v. Surface Preparation Systems Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API