Legal Opinion

Kellstrom Bros. Painting v. Carriage Works, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 23, 1992No. 8900412CV; CA A66626PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendants 1 appeal a judgment for plaintiff in this action under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA). ORS 95.200 et seq. We reverse in part.

The parties stipulated the facts. Defendants Rowlett and John and Barbara Evensizer were among the shareholders in defendant The Carriage Works, Inc. (Carriage Works). Before April, 1988, plaintiff furnished $4,288 worth of paint and supplies to Carriage Works, for which it has not been paid. South Valley State Bank (Bank) had a valid perfected security interest in the assets of Carriage Works to secure loans in excess of $290,000. Rowlett was a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Jackson County v. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary AuthorityOregon Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ries v. Wintz Properties, Inc. (In Re Wintz Companies)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Oregon Account Systems, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Dietter v. DietterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. National Loan Investors, L.P. v. World Properties, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Jecker v. Hidden Valley, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API