Legal Opinion

Norris v. R & T Manufacturing, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 2014No. 101116202; A153039PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

Plaintiff Kenneth Norris, who prevailed at trial on his claim against defendant R & T Manufacturing under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), ORS 95.200 to 95.310, appeals from a supplemental judgment disallowing his request for attorney fees. We affirm.

The underlying facts are described in Norris v. R & T Manufacturing, LLC, 265 Or App 672, 338 P3d 150 (2014) (Norris I). In summary, plaintiff was previously awarded a judgment against Action Accessories, LLC (Action), in a statutory wage claim, but was unable to collect on the judgment. Plaintiff brought his claim under UFTA,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Williams v. SALEM WOMEN'S CLINICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Johnson v. JeppeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Olson v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Menasha Forest Products Corp. v. Curry County Title, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District v. AizawaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Harder v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  3. P. O. B. v. HarnyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API