Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying four opinions, the issues in this case are decided as follows:
*2801. Seven members of the court reverse the judgment of the district court. They hold that the district court has jurisdiction and that the complaint states a claim for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2409a. Two members of the court dissent.
2. Seven members of the court hold that the 12-year statute of limitations provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2409a(f) applies. Two members of the court dissent.
3. Six members of the court hold that the government is vested with indefeasible title. Three judges dissent.
On…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Shirley Presley v. City of Charlottesville Rivanna Trails FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Dunbar Corp. v. LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Pearl Saylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Albert J. Cadorette v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.