Legal Opinion

Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1982No. 82-1212, 82-1246PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals a magistrate’s order awarding compensation to Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr., for lands taken by the government for inclusion in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area. The magistrate found that Fulcher had brought a timely and well-founded claim under the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, and awarded compensation accordingly. Because we find that Fulcher’s claim is time-barred under the Quiet Title Act, we reverse.

I

The facts of this controversy are set out more fully in our prior en banc consideration of this case,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Knapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. Grynberg v. Total S.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Catellus Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. United States v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
  5. Wilkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API