Legal Opinion
Stewart v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 2012No. Nos. 10-CO-1310, 10-CO-1311PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Senior Judge:
In this case, which arises from a triple murder as well as the separate shooting and wounding of a woman over a drug debt of twenty-five cents, Michael C. Stewart appeals from an order of the trial court (Hiram E. Puig-Lugo, J.), entered on September 30, 2010, denying Stewart’s motion for post-conviction relief. Stewart’s motion was based primarily on his contention that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective. The only issue raised by Stewart which warrants plenary discussion arises from his claim that shortly after his sentencing on February 22, 1997, he…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Fontaine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Garza v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- KEVIN M. BELLINGER v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- V.C.B. v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.