Legal Opinion

Rodriquez v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 2, 1969No. 749PublishedCited by 421 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

Petitioner brought this suit for post-conviction relief under 28 U. S. C. § 2255, alleging that after his conviction on several narcotics charges he had been improperly denied his right to appeal. Petitioner was sentenced to 11 concurrent 20-year terms on June 20, 1963. Immediately after the sentencing, petitioner’s retained counsel attempted to make a motion requesting leave for petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis. The trial judge cut petitioner’s counsel off, saying that all motions had to be in writing. Without making any further inquiry, he adjourned the court. No written motions were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by421 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Garza v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

416 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API