Donegan v. Houston
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action to recover for grading and excavating done by plaintiff for defendants on fifteen acres of land in the city of Los Angeles. Judgment was for plaintiff and defendants appeal from the judgment and order denying a new trial.
The complaint alleges the cause of action in the following language: “Now comes the plaintiff and says that within the last two years past, he did grading and excavating for the defendants, for which they agreed to pay him the sum of six thousand one hundred seventy-three dollars. ’ ’
By answer, counterclaim and cross-complaint defendants set out a special…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Vance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Haggerty v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Meer v. CeratiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Harris v. SeidellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bledsoe v. StuckeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.