Bledsoe v. Stuckey
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leslie B. Hewitt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
This action was brought to recover an alleged balance of $313.30 on a promissory note for $2,675, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage securing the same. Defendant by his answer pleaded payment of the note in full, and by cross-complaint seeks to recover from plaintiff "the sum of $546, which defendant claims to have paid by mistake, in excess • of his indebtedness on the transaction. The judgment was that plaintiff take nothing by his action, and that the defendant recover the amount of overpayment alleged in his cross-complaint.
The main contention on the appeal is as to the application of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Vance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Kreling v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Zimmerman v. Continental Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Mitchell v. California-Pacific Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.